MTI Basics Freestanding Bathtub (66" x 32" x 20"). MTI Digital: Equipment for Your Business' Background Music …. Vorinclex the Finisher (Pioneer MTG Deck). Insider: Into the Realm of Foils | Quiet Speculation. MTG Standard Format | Magic: The Gathering. Veyran, Voice of Duality EDH (Commander / EDH MTG Deck). Pauper: Taking the Initiative on the Competitive Metagame. The beautiful type of shine from the flawless filter without the base product tinting it up.Belisle Family Elated With New MTI 390X - Speed on …. So then I bought the beauty light wand and it was perfect. As someone else said, the Auric shine is more subtle and it’s more of a grippy product that feels like it’s designed to be layered under other things. I know both the Oric and the CTHFF are commonly used both as a glowy primer or as a spot highlight and they both work ok, but I think the HFF works better as a spot highlight (or a spot primer just for the cheeks if that’s a thing) and the Auric is better as an all over primer. Then I bought the auric and the formula wasn’t quite what I wanted, it didn’t really glow enough to work as a highlighter. The CT HFF Is a fantastic formula but like you, I bought the mini size in shade two (being the latest shade available) and it was too dark and peachy for me. I also got this for my wedding make up and like you I have light cool skin. I have all three products, the CT HFF mini in shade 2, the Auric in morganite, and the CT Beauty Light Wand. If you’re looking for it as just a highlighter, have you considered the CT beauty light wand in spotlight? It’s a very similar idea to the flawless filter and auric glowlust the but without the base tint part. However depending on the finish Auric sounds like it's the product that would better suit your wants.Īs a side-note: How much are you are going to want to use this purchase after your wedding? The CT comes in a mini and the Auric product is fairly giant. My skin is very light reflecting so the slight metallic nature is infinity more flattering on me than Auric which can come off as subtle even after attempting to build up multiple layers. Neither are "bad products" but I vastly prefer the Charlotte Tilbury product over the Auric for the formula alone. As a liquid highlighter this leans more in a subtle glow than a shine. The reflection is also pretty neutral but it does lean slightly sliver in my experience. The reformulated morganite has a very pale true neutral base. There is no sparkles but also no linear shine. The shimmer particles are also very finely milled but the base of the formula gives a more subtle dispersed finish. Once blended out it remains slightly tacky and almost has a grippy texture. It goes on thicker too and I would describe it as a semi setting formula. As solely a liquid highlighter it is more in line with an actual highlighter than a subtle lit from within glow as the product is actively shiny.Īuric is a little thicker formula wise and feels more like a whipped or cream formula. Fair 2 is extremely peachy but still has a silver reflect. Fair 1 is very pink with a silver reflect. The base is pigmented enough to offer some kind of correction but sheer enough to let your skin shine through. Shade range wise the tones/ undertones in CT are heavily skewed towards very pale people. It all depends on the natural light reflection of your skin. This result can look off and pore enhancing or really natural and glowy. It's shine particles are very finely milled and gives of an almost linear reflection which makes the product appear more metallic. For targeted application as highlighter it still doesn't dry down fully but I don't have the "heaviness" issue. It does go on very thinly but it can feel slightly heavy if I use it as a base or as a tinted moisturizer as it doesn't really dry down. I own both: Auric Glowlust in the Reformulated Morganite Shade and Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter in Shade 2.įormula wise I find them pretty different.ĬT has a very smooth emollient formula.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |